![]() |
![]() | |||||
![]() |
![]() | |||||
![]() |
![]() |
.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Were the Tasaday a Stone Age tribe ignorant of the outside world? Not according to one former "Tasaday," who told Iten "the whole thing was a swindle." Far from subsisting on forest products, Iten found that the Tasaday had depended on rice handouts from Manuel Elizalde, Jr., the government culture minister blamed for orchestrating the whole hoax.
There's no place like home?
Iten's report scorched the previous decade's conventional wisdom. Read his findings on pages 40 through 57 in "The Tasaday Controversy:... " in the bibliography.
The furor over anthropological gullibility reached such a pitch that the American Anthropological Association cobbled together a blue-
Anthropologist Thomas Headland, who's now with the Summer Institute of Linguistics, edited the association's book. He concluded that the Tasaday "did not deliberately deceive the public, but neither were they primitive foragers isolated for hundreds of years from outside contact (see pp. 215-
Perhaps the Tasaday were not a fraud. But they clearly had benefited from some false advertising. Headland dismissed most of the features that had made the group famous to begin with. In 1971, at the time of the discovery, Headland thinks the Tasaday
Ouch!
At least medical doctors do not administer fraud. Right? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
.
There are 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 pages in this feature. Bibliography | Credits | Feedback | Search ©1999, University of Wisconsin, Board of Regents. | |